AMD Ryzen reviews are in and the Ultimate Geforce GTX 1080 TI has landed | The Full Nerd #18 Live!

Spread the love

This week Gordon, Adam and Brad talk what’s right and what’s wrong with Ryzen. Brad busts out the gourmet stuff with the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and we do an extended question and answer period.


More from my site

29 thoughts on “AMD Ryzen reviews are in and the Ultimate Geforce GTX 1080 TI has landed | The Full Nerd #18 Live!

  • March 7, 2017 at 7:30 am

    guys im that big jerk with to much money to spend .i go flagship with guys make me feel like i blow my not a guy that likes to go half seem scared of amd.the ford of pc parts 🙂 i use a titan x and drive a Nissan titan. da best . amd ford of the computer products.found on road dead .ford.releases a very broken product .are you guys that broke???????

  • March 7, 2017 at 7:54 am

    and i love this show, nerdy guy that never showers .to the awesome Asian tec guy to the handsome white guy that does not no shit .best 145 mins of my week love you guys…

  • March 7, 2017 at 2:04 pm

    Reviewing games with the RYZEN in games @1080p med settings Isn't a real life test.. Most people will play games at High or Ultra settings even at 1080p.. Which means RYZEN 7 CPU''s will be about even to Intel in games….

  • March 7, 2017 at 3:10 pm

    I take a all amd 1800x with any xfire ati/amd gpu system over the intel/nvidia tax/take and pay what we give you,   and not to mention not being in the same boat as the uber intel elite fan boys are on

  • March 7, 2017 at 4:22 pm

    Not sure how I have missed your content this far but I feel like I have truly missed out! great quality feel and content! signed…your new subscriber!!

  • March 7, 2017 at 6:45 pm

    Most reviewers for the Ryzen come from gaming camp (maybe they use PC for gaming 80% of the time and 20% other stuff) . . . but I think Ryzen was made for productivity folks (content/3D rendering/etc.) with some occasional gaming.

  • March 7, 2017 at 7:20 pm

    Guys you are missing a fundamental point about what Ryzen brings, I haven't built a PC for gaming in a long time but when I did was during the AMD K6/Athlon era. During that time yes you could find an Intel chip that outperformed the AMD offering but where AMD won out was "Price + Performance = more to spend on a better graphics card and memory".

    You noted that if you coupled a chip like the 1700 with a 1080 monitor and a cheaper/older graphics card then even old Intel chips outperformed it at gaming. You also noted that the 1800X combined with a 4K gaming monitor and a top end graphics card like a NVIDIA 1080 then the difference was negligible against the top end Intel chip.

    The thing is the top end Intel Chip is over twice the price of the 1800X and the latter will only get cheaper. For the cost conscious enthusiast system building looking to build a powerful gaming platform going back to me original adage "Price + Performance = more to spend on a better graphics card and memory" puts the 1800X into a very attractive position. With the money saved on the processor the top end graphics card and 4K monitor becomes more reachable.

    If you are looking at a Graphics card and monitor as a long term investment that will be used for further upgraded machines the 1800X becomes a no brainer choice!

    The key issue at this time is optimisation plus guys like yourselves not looking at the bigger picture.

  • March 7, 2017 at 8:03 pm

    windows 7 people says rizen has better min fps than windows 10. Windows 10 needs a update they arent even reading SMT correctly.

  • March 7, 2017 at 11:37 pm

    intel will come out with 10 cores to replace some of there 8 cores 6 cores to replace 4 core cpu's same price as 7700k with there luanch price

  • March 7, 2017 at 11:43 pm

    i think amd is aiming for only vulkin api for cpu gpu gaming

  • March 8, 2017 at 4:58 am

    If you guys are monitoring this, i have a question… What's the point of any frame rate that is above the refresh rate of your monitor… Since most of these people with 1080p monitor's also only have 60 ghz refresh rates, what's the point of having so much above the refresh rate of your monitor other than it being basically a penis measuring contest ?

  • March 9, 2017 at 10:14 pm

    ryzen is not a gaming cpu only best at work stations

  • March 9, 2017 at 10:16 pm

    but for the intel work station stuff get a 2011v3 cpu 🙂

  • March 12, 2017 at 5:02 pm

    This is crazy, I'll take the cores and threads of AMD over basically over the I7 7700K any day.. Its IPC is just about the same. Its That 5.0 Clock speed that's the only difference.. Once AMD figures out how to get there chips to 5.0, Your not going to see such a single core disparity between the two Really.. I don't need 200FPS a 100 to 120 fps is fine with me.. I'm a 60 FPS gamer.. And everyone knows that's all you need.. I'm an average guy I'm just gonna Run an RX480 with my ryzen for now.. And by next year when Microsoft gets there shit together and a few more bios n micro updates, Ryzen will be the shit…

  • March 12, 2017 at 10:04 pm

    How many of you out there bought a 6900k for gaming most likely you bought a 6700k or 7700k both 330 to 350 dollars

  • March 13, 2017 at 2:50 pm

    So what you guys are saying is…
    If you have 2 GTX1080's in SLI and you game at 1080p or 720p or even 480p with ULTRA-LOW settings then get an intel Core i5 CPU!!!
    I agree, coz everybody does that right!

  • March 17, 2017 at 3:01 pm

    I wonder who can look at a screen and tell the difference between 300 and 500 fps. Really if you are well above the refresh rate of your monitor there should be no visual difference especially with Freesync and G-sync. For me if it runs consistently above 60fps in 1080 thats all I need.

  • April 2, 2017 at 3:05 am

    Hai sir it my request i am using in very low cpu no graphics card i am so much love my games i don't play tom clancy division or ghost recon Advanced Warfighter 2 i am so much loved game and gamer i have no graphics card please give me a graphics card i am saying lying please

  • August 5, 2017 at 5:35 am

    Must have been something wrong with the PC. Every benchmark out there now says this was some sort of mistake

Comments are closed.